Toxic Beauty Trends: Is the beauty industry promoting unrealistic standards?
Toxic beauty standards and trends have been a long-standing issue in the beauty industry. The pressure to conform to unrealistic standards has led to a culture of body shaming, low self-esteem, and even mental health issues.
The beauty industry has been criticized for promoting these toxic standards, which are often unattainable. One of the most significant toxic beauty standards is the idea of the ‘perfect’ body. The media often portrays a thin, toned body as the ideal, leading many people to engage in unhealthy behaviors such as extreme dieting, over-exercising, and even eating disorders.
Another toxic beauty trend is the use of skin-lightening products. In many cultures, fair skin is considered more desirable, leading to the use of skin-lightening creams and treatments.
The use of cosmetic surgery to achieve a certain look is also a toxic beauty trend. Many people feel pressure to alter their appearance through surgery to fit into society’s beauty standards, completely disregarding the long-term implications of these procedures.
The beauty industry has also been criticized for promoting unrealistic beauty standards for women’s hair. Straight, long hair is often seen as the ideal, leading many women to chemically straighten their natural hair. Beauty standards and trends have been a part of human culture for centuries.
However, in recent times, the pressure to conform to these standards has become increasingly toxic. The beauty industry, fueled by social media and advertising, has created unrealistic expectations and unattainable beauty standards that can have harmful effects.
But with the digital age, a new method of promoting unrealistic beauty standards has surfaced. AI apps and features on social media that do all the heavy lifting for those seeking a ‘perfect’ look.
The Photoshop Paradox
One cannot deny that Photoshop and other image editing tools have revolutionized the way we perceive beauty. Airbrushing and retouching have become the norm, creating an air of perfection that is unattainable in reality. Celebrities and influencers have embraced these tools, setting a precedent for impressionable young women who aspire to emulate their flawless appearance.
While the beauty industry has thrived on these ideals, it has also faced backlash for perpetuating unrealistic standards. Magazines have long been criticized for their cover images, with models seemingly devoid of any blemish or imperfection. These images are often presented as the epitome of beauty, fostering a culture of insecurity and self-doubt among women.
Filters: The new age beauty mask
Filters have taken this illusion a step further. With a simple swipe, individuals can transform their appearance, smoothing out wrinkles, enhancing their features, and adding a luminous glow. Social media platforms like Instagram and Snapchat have popularized these filters, making it effortless for users to present a seemingly flawless version of themselves.
The impact of these filters on young women’s self-esteem cannot be underestimated. Studies have shown that excessive use of filters can lead to body dysmorphic disorder and depression, as individuals struggle to reconcile their filtered selves with their unaltered reality. The beauty industry, often complicit in this narrative, benefits from the insecurities these filters create.
The rise of AI-generated beauty
Enter the era of AI-generated beauty. With algorithms capable of creating hyper-realistic images that are indistinguishable from genuine photographs, young women are increasingly lured into the allure of this digital utopia. Apps like “AI Beautify” and “Perfect Me” have gained traction, allowing users to instantly transform themselves into an idealized version of beauty.
The allure of AI-generated beauty lies in its seamlessness. Unlike filters that can be detected, these AI-generated images present a mirage of perfection that is difficult to distinguish from reality. Young women, impressionable and eager for validation, are drawn into a vicious cycle of digital enhancement, perpetuating the notion that their natural selves are inadequate.
Also read: Why Justina Wamae disagrees with increase of counties