Interview clash: Was it wrong for Azziad to walk out on Mwende Macharia?
Was it really wrong for content creator Azziad Nasenya to walk out on Radio Maisha’s Mwende Macharia in the middle of an interview?
Let’s analyze.
Apparently Azziad walked out on Mwende when she portrayed a lack of journalistic ethics. The incident, which was live-streamed on TikTok, ignited a heated debate about the boundaries of journalistic inquiry and personal privacy.
During the interview, Mwende broached a subject that both parties had seemingly agreed not to discuss – the recent disbandment of Talanta Hela Council, to which Azziad had been appointed.
The unexpected turn of events immediately unsettled Azziad. Feeling blindsided, she firmly expressed her discontent and stormed out the studio in protest.
Also read: Why Kennedy Rapudo and Jimal Roho Safi are throwing shade at each other
Mwende, however, defended her line of questioning by emphasizing her responsibility as a journalist. She argued that Azziad’s views on the disbandment of Talanta Hela Council would have offered the audience a better perspective of the issue.
“I am a journalist, if I hadn’t asked that question then the interview would have been meaningless,” said Mwende.
Mwende said she believes her inquiry was fair, considering Azziad had responded with a “no comment,” which, in her opinion, warranted further exploration rather than an abrupt departure from the interview.
The incident has sparked a broader conversation about the delicate balance between journalistic integrity and respecting an individual’s privacy. While some argue that journalists have a duty to ask difficult questions in pursuit of the truth, others hold the view that there should be limits to protect the personal boundaries and emotional well-being of interviewees.
Also read: Why Jalang’o was better off as a comedian than a politician
Critics of Mwende’s approach argue that the prior agreement not to discuss the contentious issue should have been respected, as it was essential to maintaining a trusting and professional environment. They assert that the boundaries set in advance should have been honoured, and venturing into sensitive territory without consent undermined the integrity of the interview.
On the other hand, supporters of Mwende argue that journalists have an obligation to push beyond surface-level information and address potentially uncomfortable subjects. They further argue that by asking difficult questions, journalists can uncover important truths and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the individuals they interview.
Netizens continue to argue that the incident involving Azziad and Mwende serves as a reminder of the ongoing ethical considerations surrounding journalistic practices.
Also read: Bahati falls out with Ziiki Media over his ‘hacked’ YouTube channel